Posts

The ins and outs of tax on “income investments”

/in , /by

Many investors, especially more risk-averse ones, hold much of their portfolios in “income investments” — those that pay interest or dividends, with less emphasis on growth in value. But all income investments aren’t alike when it comes to taxes. So it’s important to be aware of the different tax treatments when managing your income investments.

Varying tax treatment

The tax treatment of investment income varies partly based on whether the income is in the form of dividends or interest. Qualified dividends are taxed at your favorable long-term capital gains tax rate (currently 0%, 15% or 20%, depending on your tax bracket) rather than at your ordinary-income tax rate (which might be as high as 39.6%). Interest income generally is taxed at ordinary-income rates. So stocks that pay dividends might be more attractive tax-wise than interest-paying income investments, such as CDs and bonds.

But there are exceptions. For example, some dividends aren’t qualified and therefore are subject to ordinary-income rates, such as certain dividends from:

Real estate investment trusts (REITs),
Regulated investment companies (RICs),
Money market mutual funds, and
Certain foreign investments.
Also, the tax treatment of bond interest varies. For example:

Interest on U.S. government bonds is taxable on federal returns but exempt on state and local returns.
Interest on state and local government bonds is excludable on federal returns. If the bonds were issued in your home state, interest also might be excludable on your state return.
Corporate bond interest is fully taxable for federal and state purposes.

One of many factors

Keep in mind that tax reform legislation could affect the tax considerations for income investments. For example, if your ordinary rate goes down under tax reform, there could be less of a difference between the tax rate you’d pay on qualified vs. nonqualified dividends.

While tax treatment shouldn’t drive investment decisions, it’s one factor to consider — especially when it comes to income investments. For help factoring taxes into your investment strategy, contact us.

A vision for “transformational” tax reform

/in , , /by

In a recent speech to the National Association of Manufacturers, House Speaker Paul Ryan urged Republicans to seize this “historic opportunity” to enact meaningful tax reform. With few details, he listed goals that included a simplified tax code, lower tax rates, improved global competitiveness for American businesses, elimination of special interest carveouts and permanent changes that give businesses certainty to plan for the future. Ryan projected that a realistic timeline for tax reform would be the end of 2017.

Raffensperger, Martin & Finkenbiner will continue to follow the potential tax reform. In truth, many of us thought the bill would be law by now, and the rates and changes would have been retroactive to January 1, 2017. Based on the timeframe, we anticipate that any changes would not be law until January 1, 2018. 

As of now, that makes proactive tax planning a little more challenging as what’s good this year may be altered in the future. However, we will continue to recommend options and new ideas that provide immediate benefit. We will still look at long-term plans but will be more conservative in our recommendations depending on the situation and circumstance.