May 2017 Tax & Business Alert

Businesses that have acquired, constructed or substantially improved a building recently should consider a cost segregation study. One of these studies can enable the company to accelerate depreciation deductions, reducing taxes and boosting cash flow. This article explains how. A sidebar points out that a “look-back” study can review many previous years of tax filings for missed deductions.

 

Someone who’s terminally or chronically ill may lack the funds to cover significant medical costs. It may be possible, however, to sell insurance to a viatical settlement provider who will then arrange with an investor to buy the policy. This article explains how such “viatical settlements” work, including the tax impact

 

Income in respect of a decedent (IRD) can create a surprisingly high tax bill for those who inherit property, especially substantial distributions from IRAs or retirement plans. This article discusses how IRD works and what taxpayers can do to claim an itemized deduction for estate taxes attributable to amounts reported as IRD.

 

In certain cases, an “innocent” spouse can apply for relief from the responsibility of paying tax, interest and penalties arising from a spouse’s (or former spouse’s) improperly handled tax return. This brief article reviews the rules for potentially affected taxpayers.

What Do the Tangible Property Rules Mean to You?

Businesses often wrestle with understanding what items should be deducted versus what should be expensed. That task got a little more complicated this year when the Internal Revenue Service finalized new tangible property rules. They affect every business that has tangible property (buildings, machinery, equipment, furniture, vehicles, etc…) so they’re pretty far reaching. And they add a new layer of complexity to your tax planning.

 

We can help you address the new requirements, which may include determining whether you need to complete additional paperwork to request a change in accounting method. Be sure to contact us to learn about handling this and any other tax law changes that may affect your business.

Recent tax regulations to be re-examined

President Trump signed an Executive Order directing the Treasury to review tax regs adopted during the past 18 months under former President Obama. According to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, the re-examination of these regs is to ensure that they “do not unduly strain the American economy.” Regs that are determined to be “harmful rules that impose unnecessary costs and complexity on taxpayers” are to be revised or repealed. Mnuchin said the corporate inversion regs will be “one of the things we would be looking at.”

Do you know the tax implications of your C corp.’s buy-sell agreement?

Private companies with more than one owner should have a buy-sell agreement to spell out how ownership shares will change hands should an owner depart. For businesses structured as C corporations, the agreements also have significant tax implications that are important to understand.

Buy-sell basics

A buy-sell agreement sets up parameters for the transfer of ownership interests following stated “triggering events,” such as an owner’s death or long-term disability, loss of license or other legal incapacitation, retirement, bankruptcy, or divorce. The agreement typically will also specify how the purchase price for the departing owner’s shares will be determined, such as by stating the valuation method to be used.

Another key issue a buy-sell agreement addresses is funding. In many cases, business owners don’t have the cash readily available to buy out a departing owner. So insurance is commonly used to fund these agreements. And this is where different types of agreements — which can lead to tax issues for C corporations — come into play.

Under a cross-purchase agreement, each owner buys life or disability insurance (or both) that covers the other owners, and the owners use the proceeds to purchase the departing owner’s shares. Under a redemption agreement, the company buys the insurance and, when an owner exits the business, buys his or her shares.

Sometimes a hybrid agreement is used that combines aspects of both approaches. It may stipulate that the company gets the first opportunity to redeem ownership shares and that, if the company is unable to buy the shares, the remaining owners are then responsible for doing so. Alternatively, the owners may have the first opportunity to buy the shares.

C corp. tax consequences

A C corp. with a redemption agreement funded by life insurance can face adverse tax consequences. First, receipt of insurance proceeds could trigger corporate alternative minimum tax.

Second, the value of the remaining owners’ shares will probably rise without increasing their basis. This, in turn, could drive up their tax liability if they later sell their shares.

Heightened liability for the corporate alternative minimum tax is generally unavoidable under these circumstances. But you may be able to manage the second problem by revising your buy-sell as a cross-purchase agreement. Under this approach, owners will buy additional shares themselves — increasing their basis.

Naturally, there are downsides. If owners are required to buy a departing owner’s shares, but the company redeems the shares instead, the IRS may characterize the purchase as a taxable dividend. Your business may be able to mitigate this risk by crafting a hybrid agreement that names the corporation as a party to the transaction and allows the remaining owners to buy back the shares without requiring them to do so.

For more information on the tax ramifications of buy-sell agreements, contact us. And if your business doesn’t have a buy-sell in place yet, we can help you figure out which type of funding method will best meet your needs while minimizing any negative tax consequences.